ქელბექსერბეთის საპრეზიდენტო არჩევნები 2004-ში :
http://www.osce.org/documents/odihr/2004/09/3620_en.pdfძირითადი ამონარიდები:
In response to an invitation from Mr. Predrag Markovic, Speaker of the Serbian National
Assembly the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR)
observed the 13 June 2004 presidential elections in Serbia (Serbia and Montenegro). The
OSCE/ODIHR assessed the presidential elections in terms of its compliance with the
1990 OSCE Copenhagen Document and other election- related commitments.
..............................................
The campaigning was conducted in a generally calm atmosphere. Candidates held rallies
across Serbia, including parts of Kosovo. There was a general lack of inflammatory
language in the first round, but the rhetoric became more heated in the second.
-------------------------------------
The media provided the voters with broad and generally balanced coverage of the
campaign. The state-owned RTS complied with its own rules by providing candidates
with equal quantities of airtime. Private media outlets, such as Mr. Karic’s BK TV, were
more apt to show some bias towards a particular candidate in terms of time allotted or
tone of coverage. The Republican Broadcasting Agency issued binding instructions for
the coverage of the campaign in the media, but did not appear to play a significant role in
monitoring media activities.
-----------------------------------------
Difficulties were encountered in the interpretation and implementation of the new Law on
Financing of Political Parties, which came into effect on 1 January 2004. As the law was
interpreted differently by the presidential candidates and the Ministry of Finance, the
candidates were confused about the quantity of state funding which was due to them
under the law. Finally, 11 of the first round candidates launched a legal action against the
Ministry. Uncertainty prevailed as to where responsibility for the implementation of the
law should lie, and the OSCE/ODIHR recommends that this should be addressed with
some urgency.
იგივე სერბეთის საპარლმენტო არჩევნები 2007-ში:
The 21 January 2007 Elections to the National Assembly in the Republic of Serbia were
conducted in line with the OSCE Commitments and other standards for democratic elections.
They provided a genuine opportunity for the citizens of Serbia to freely choose from a range
of political platforms. The campaign was calm, and institutional checks and balances ensured
that the election results were recorded accurately, transparently and in a timely manner.
Voting on election day was conducted in a peaceful and orderly fashion. The officials
performed their tasks in a well-organized and professional manner, which contributed to the
high level of confidence among the voters. The counting went smoothly and efficiently.
Turnout exceeded pre-election predictions, and ultimately 60.56 per cent of the registered
voters participated.
--------------------------
The campaign was vigorous and carried out in an unrestricted atmosphere. A diverse range
of media provided voters with extensive information about the parties, the candidates and
their campaign activities. Public broadcasters generally provided balanced coverage of the
campaigns of the major parties. Election-related news coverage and advertising was
predominantly positive in tone.
The Republic Election Commission (REC) conducted its work in an open and transparent
manner. Each party, coalition, or group of citizens submitting a candidate list had the right to
delegate one member and one deputy member to the “extended” composition of the REC and
Polling Boards. This level of inclusiveness contributed to the general confidence of
contestants in the administrative conduct of the elections.
მომავალი არჩევნების შეფასება მინდა ასეთი, როგორიც ზემოთ წერია და არა ეს ყივჩაღობა, რაც 1992 წლიდან მოყოლებული გვაქვს.
Hamburgers. The cornerstone of any nutritious breakfast.
ეუთოს მორიგი შეფასება (ძალიან უარყოფითი), as bad or very bad.
