წყალბადის აპარატურა, საოცრება!!! ქალაქს სჭირდება ეკოლოგიური დაცვა

ე ბიჯო ერთი თვეა ეს ტემა ტივტივებს აქ და უფასოდ გიყენებთო ეს კაცი იძახდა კიდე ვერავინ დააყენა?

იმის მაგივრად რო პრაქტიკაში ნახონ მუშაობს თუ არა, დგანან და რაც არ ესმით იმაზე თეორიებს აცხობენ.

ყველაზე არაპრაქტიკული ხალხი მსოფლიოში.

ესაც ინფორმაცია სტან მაერის შესახებ კითხვა პასუხის სახით

Lets examine those Stan Meyer claims:
- 1. His death was very suspicious.
No. The coroner did a thorough examination, death was due to a ruptured cerebral aneurism - an artery swelled up and burst in his skull, the bleeding caused pressure and damage to his brain. It is a natural cause of death. Those claiming "poison" haven't examined the body, have done no toxicology tests, have no evidence whatsoever.
- 2. He did have government contracts to develop his system.
And your evidence is? Simply because he claimed he did? Scam artists like Meyers are known for their big lies.
- 3. He had just completed negotiations to acquire a huge tract of land for a research facility.
A "huge tract of land" isn't required for research. More likely, it was a way to invest all the loot.
- 4. His friends and neighbors support his cloak and dagger claims, he was often visited by men in limousines wearing turbans and robes, often shortly followed by Military vehicles.
Again, a big lie to promote the scam. Those "friends" could be shills, or the "visits" were staged. When Arab oil officials visit the US, they usually wear neatly tailored suits, not robes.
- 5. Many noteworthy individuals, scientist and professors have agreed that his devices worked.
"Worked" as in passing electricity through water makes hydrogen that can fuel an engine - but since it takes 14 TIMES THE TOTAL ENGINE POWER OUTPUT TO PRODUCE ENOUGH HYDROGEN TO RUN THE ENGINE, it cannot even run itself, let alone power a car. It didn't work as a "water powered car".
- 6. His patents were approved by actual testing and analysis.
That's not how the patent process works. The Patent Office does not require a working model except for "perpetual motion" devices, thus does no actual testing. The analysis is to see if someone else might have patented it, and see if the design appears to be functional. Practicality is not an issue. Meyers patent assumes a battery powering his electrolysis cell to fuel the engine, which technically would work for a short time until the battery ran down. At 7% efficiency, it's a really silly idea, but still potentially patentable. His patent application does not mention his claim that it is self-powering, as that would have caused a denial of patent.
- 7. His conviction of fraud was a highly irregular and contested case and they never disproved his case.
The fraud was that he took money from developers and customers with promises to deliver the devices, and he didn't deliver. It was his customers that brought the case, they got tired of his endless excuses, and he was convicted in an open court of law. It is a straightforward breach of contract. Meyers was the one that couldn't disprove the case.
- 8. Many of the processes he described that were called bad science are now recognized as common knowledge (resonant cavities in microwave ovens, ionic wind, LC resonant circuits, etc...)
Sorry, wrong again. Resonance has a long and well known history in science, it has NEVER been considered "bad science".
- 9. His system does not violate any laws, he said so himself.
You're taking the word of a convicted fraud?
- He has simply developed a process for extracting energy from a source. Gasoline must be processed and refined before being used as a fuel. He claims to have found a way to refine H2O into H2 and O2 with a very low power input. Not electrolysis!
Using an electrical current to split chemical bonds is "electrolysis", whether it is DC or pulsed DC or AC doesn't matter, it IS electrolysis. Refining oil is simply a process of separation of a mixture of already flammable substance, no chemical bonds need to be broken. Splitting water molecules is not a simple separation, the chemical bonds between H and O must be broken, and that takes a lot of energy, 14 times more energy than can be recovered by burning in an internal combustion engine. Meyers cell produced a large volume of gas with a low power input, but that is only because hydrogen is a very low density "lighter than air" gas. A full gallon of that "electrolysis gas", uncompressed, is the energy equivalent of just a droplet of gasoline.

"Improving fuel economy" was not Meyers claim, he claimed to run without any fuel but water.
The fuel economy improvements reported by HHO enthusiasts are due to reduced performance and the placebo effect.

+

იხურება!