Who are the best players of all time who underperformed at the majors? It's a tough question, and one I've tried to tackle before. So that we're only ranking players we've seen play, either live or on tape, let's make this an Open Era list. And remember what we're judging here: the ranking is based on ability and the degree to which that ability was frustrated on tennis' biggest stages.
Here's the Top Five:
5. Roger Federer
OK, how can Roger be on this list, right? I mean, the guy is the all-time record holder at the slams and is still the best choice for GOAT. Simple: Federer is so good that, even with 16 titles to his name, you can legitimately make the case that he's underperformed at the majors. After all, he announced his arrival as a mature, big-time player with his 2001 Wimbledon win over defending and seven-time champion Sampras -- and then it took him two more years before he cashed his first Grand Slam champion's check. In the meantime, he managed to lose at majors to Tim Henman, Max Mirnyi, Hicham Arazi, Mario Ancic and Luis Horna, among others. Plus, between his 2003 Wimbledon breakthrough and last year (when he unofficially went into decline), every Grand Slam loss to someone not named Nadal has to count as underperforming. So that includes losses to David Nalbandian, Marat Safin, Juan Martin del Potro and a gimpy Gustavo Kuerten. Maybe it's unfair that we simply cannot accept anything but sustained greatness from Federer, but there it is.
წაიკითხეთ რა და აზრი გამოიტანეთ
უსაზღვრო გენიალიზმი მადაფაქააააა!!
ანუ როჯერი აგებდა იმას რაც არ უნდა წაეგო და ტიპს მაინც მსოფლიოში საუკეთესო შედეგი აქ
· 
ROGER FEDERER-ის ქომაგთა კლუბი(Part 6), THE GREATEST TENNIS PLAYER OF ALL TIME
