3 ჯერ ვუყურე უკვე.
ესეიგი მესმის კარგად რატომაც არ მოეწონა ბევრს, მაგრამ ეს კინო არ იყო მასაზე გათვლილი, ჩემი აზრით, რადგან მაგის დანიშნულება ისაა, რომ კინოს დამთავრების შემდეგ დაგაფიქროს და კითხვებზე პასუხი თავადვე გაგაცემინოს.
გრანდიოზული სცენები იყო.
მორჩა თუ არა, გავიფიქრე აუ რაღაც ***** არის-მეთქი, მაგრამ 10-15 წუთის მერე დაგროვებულ თითქოს "ალოგიკურ" კითხვებს (დეივიდის მოტივაცია, ინჟინრების მიზანი, სხვადასხვა ნიუანსი) პასუხი მოვუძებნე, აქედან მხოლოდ 1-2ა ჩემს ფანტაზიაზე, დანარჩენს კი თავად კინო სცემს პასუხს, უბრალოდ დაკვირვება უნდა. აბსოლიტურად ყველა მოქმედება რაღაც მიზეზს ემორჩილება, არაფერი ხდება შემთხვევით

ცუდზეც ვიტყვი...
1. მუსიკა კი მართლა კარგი იყო, მაგრამ კონკრეტულად ერთი "Planet" მეორდებოდა და მეორდებოდა ისეთ ადგილებში, სადაც, ვფიქრობ, რომ უკეთესი იქნებოდა რამე უფრო ეპიკური გამოეყენებინათ.
2. ზოგიერთი სცენის უკეთესად ჩვენება შეიძლებოდა, მაგ ბოლო ნაწილი ძალიან სწრაფად მოხდა (შოუსა და დეივიდის წასვლა), მაგრამ ალბათ მიზეზი გასაგებია - რომ არ გაგვეგო ზუსტად სად.
სხვა არაფერი

Waiting for sequel to see Gods and Titans!!!
p.s. რამდენიმე კარგ კითხვა პასუხს დავდებ, თავად ლინდელოფისა და სკოტისგან, რომ ვინც ვერ მიხვდა ზოგიერთ რამეს, იქნებ ახლა მიხვდეს.
What was David's motivation for "infecting" Holloway with black goop?Damon Lindelof: I'd say that the short answer is: That's his programming. In the scene preceding him doing that, he is talking to Weyland (although we don't know it at the time) and he's telling Weyland that this is a bust. That they haven't found anything on this mission other than the stuff in the vials. And Weyland presumably says to him, "Well, what's in the vials?" And David would say, "I'm not entirely sure, we'll have to run some experiments." And Weyland would say, "What would happen if you put it in inside a person?" And David would say, "I don't know, I'll go find out." He doesn't know that he's poisoning Holloway, he asks Holloway, "What would you be willing to do to get the answers to your questions?" Holloway says, "Anything and everything." And that basically overrides whatever ethical programming David is mandated by, [allowing him] to spike his drink.
David has been watching Lawrence of Arabia while the crew of Prometheus was in stasis for two years, why that movie?Lindelof: Ridley and I started talking about Lawrence of Arabia, for some reason, very early on in our process. I'm a huge David Lean fan — we were talking about The Bridge on the River Kwai and then Peter O'Toole etc. etc. we just started saying oh what if David was just obsessed with Lawrence of Arabia? Why would he be obsessed with Lawrence of Arabia, and i think the short answer was: Lawrence is a stranger in a strange land. A white man who is entirely different, ultimately becomes the most pivotal figure in that movie, independent of his differences. That felt slightly analogical to what we wanted to do with David.
[Editor's Note: David's crucial line "Big things have small beginnings," is also taken from LOA.
Have they actually mapped out a motivation for the Engineers, is it supposed to remain ambiguous? Will they be mysterious forever, or can we figure them out if we pay enough attention? Was it deliberate or if they felt like they offered enough hints to the dedicated viewer, where we never really know what the advanced aliens wanted?Lindelof: Ridley definitely had very specific answers to those questions and we talked a lot about how we wanted to put those answers into Prometheus. And whether or not we wanted to hold any of them back. It's a little bit obnoxious to say, "well if you like this movie, we'll give that stuff to you in the sequel." So you have to have a fair shot at being able to extrapolate based on the information in this movie. But I do feel like, embedded in this movie are the fundamental ideas behind why it is the Engineers would want to wipe us out. If that's the question that you're asking. The movie asks the question, were we created by these beings? And it answers that question very definitively. But in the wake of that answer there's a new question, which is, they created us but now they want to destroy us, why did they change their minds? That's the question that Shaw is asking at the end of this movie, the one that she wants answered. I do think that there are a lot of hints in this movie that we give you quite and educated guess as to why. But obviously not to the detriment of what Shaw might find when she goes to talk to these things herself.
Do the Engineers want us to visit them?
In an interview with IGN, this question is addressed — but Lindelof only answers with more questions. Lindelof: That's an excellent question and one that I'm not going to answer. But I will say that there's something fascinating about humanity where we perceive it as an invitation. You look at a cave wall, there's somebody pointing at some distant planets, and one interpretation is "This is where we come from" another is "We want you to come here." Where are we drawing that from? I think another thing that's interesting about the system that they visit is that the moon the land on in Prometheus is LV 223. And we know LV 426 is where the action takes place in Alien, so are they even in the right place? And how close are they to the place that these aliens on cave walls were directing them. Were they just extrapolating "This is the system that has the sun with the sustainable life." So there's a lot of guesswork. There's a small line in the movie where David and Holloway are talking about David's deconstruction of the language based on Holloway's thesis, and he says "If your thesis is correct" and Holloway says "If it's correct?" and David says "That's why they call it a thesis Doctor." And the reason we threw that in there is that we're dealing with a highly hypothetical area in terms of who these beings are, what, if any invitation they issued, and who is responsible for making those cave paintings. And did something happen in between when those cave paintings were made — tens of thousands of years ago — and our arrival now, in 2093, 2,000 years after these things have perished. Did something happen in the intermediate period that we should be thinking about?
Is that first planet in the prologue Earth?
Movies.com got director Ridley to answer this one:Ridley Scott: No, it doesn't have to be. That could be anywhere. That could be a planet anywhere. All he's doing is acting as a gardener in space. And the plant life, in fact, is the disintegration of himself.
Did the Engineers want to kill humanity because of Jesus?
A hilarious theory, that almost made it into the script. Also coming from the great Movies.com interview (seriously go read it!). Here's Ridley's response: You throw religion and spirituality into the equation for Prometheus, though, and it almost acts as a hand grenade. We had heard it was scripted that the Engineers were targeting our planet for destruction because we had crucified one of their representatives, and that Jesus Christ might have been an alien. Was that ever considered?
Ridley Scott: We definitely did, and then we thought it was a little too on the nose. But if you look at it as an "our children are misbehaving down there" scenario, there are moments where it looks like we've gone out of control, running around with armor and skirts, which of course would be the Roman Empire. And they were given a long run. A thousand years before their disintegration actually started to happen. And you can say, "Lets' send down one more of our emissaries to see if he can stop it. Guess what? They crucified him.
სხვა:
Q: Why did the black goo turn Holloway into a monster?A: The goo is the creation of life. But it reacts to the nature of the being controlling it. Engineers believe in sacrificing themselves in order to help others. After killing Jesus, people clearly showed that we are willing to hurt others to help ourselves. The goo reacted to Holloway and turned him into a monster. That same goo didn't react at all in the hands of David, an emotionless robot.