ე.წ. ზაქარეიშვილის კონცეფციამ როგორც ჩანს საკმაო ინტერესი გამოიწვია და ზოგიერთებს არ უნახავს. ამიტომ მოვიყვან ამ კონცეფციიდან მოკლედ ზოგიერთ მომენტებს .გამოცდილებიდან ვიცი ამ ფორუმზე ვრცელი სტატიების განთავსება არაპოპულარულია
ვისაც გსურთ სრულ ტექსტს (ინგლისურად) ბოლოში ნახავთ(დოკუმენტი საკმაოდ ვრცელია! ქვემოთ დანომვრა ამ ფორუმისთვისაა მხოლოდ):

1. in ethnic conflicts the other side is not and cannot be viewed as a criminal suspect under investigation...We [Georgians] became slaves to our own truth , we did not think about the Abkhaz truth. As a result, the chance for dialogue was lost...Condemnation of nationalism will yield no results – this ideology will remain as a dominant paradigm of modern world, along with the idea of democracy...We [Georgians] should not only stop saying that the Abkhazian elite is an agent or puppet in the hands of external forces, but we should forget about this flawed idea forever.

2.we should condemn the military operation launched by the Georgian authorities on the territory of Abkhazia in August 1992. It was more than a crime – it was a mistake...it is not only pragmatically counterproductive to use the language of threats with them, but it is also unethical to do so. This does not mean that we agree on Abkhazia’s independence....we have no right to overthrow the leader elected and supported by the Abkhazians..we should understand that by threatening the Abkhazians, we will only help Russia to achieve its goals...

2". As for the return and status of tens of thousands of internally displaced persons, this issue should be solved through the negotiations. The issue of IDPs should belong to a category of legal and humanitarian aspects and a special organization should be set up on the parity basis in order to solve IDP-related problems. On the one hand, it is necessary to launch a commission, which will define the legal parameters of solution of the IDPs issue. On the other hand, it is important to create a mechanism for implementation of decisions – a special body should be set up. This body may have a status of joint Georgian-Abkhazian Agency

3. Kings David and Tamar....these two names have no less emotional value for the Abkhazians – in Abkhaz narrations, these two kings, associated with the Golden Age, are represented as the prototypes of their kings – “Apskhs.” As a result, a historical Abkhazian becomes a predecessor of a modern "collective" Georgian, while historical Abkhazia – is his native land. Here is the key for sharedness of our identity and historical space. However, these roots of our modern identity should not make us conclude, that modern Abkhazians are not right, when they demand independence. This is their will. But it should be clear for them that for "us" [Georgians] Abkhazia means more than just a picturesque Black Sea shoreline of Gagra.

4.We should offer the Abkhazians full economic cooperation. This means trade, restoration of communications, banking relations, etc. This issue is already discussed by the authorities. But it is not so important, what material profit the Georgian authorities will offer the Abkhazian population from this or that economic project. The issues of legal status and management of these projects are more essential. Otherwise, the Abkhazian side will perceive economic privileges as a proposal for selling off their own national position For clear reasons, we cannot recognize Abkhazia’s independence and accordingly, our economic relations cannot look like inter-state ties.WE SHOULD NOT DECLARE THAT ECONOMIC COOPERATION WILL NOT BE ESTABLISHED UNTIL THE IDPS RETURN TO THEIR NATIVE HOMES. SUCH STATEMENTS WERE MADE MANY TIMES PREVIOUSLY, HOWEVER YIELDED NO RESULTS.

5.Those displaced persons, who are ready to accept Abkhazian citizenship--რAს NIშNAVს GAUGEBAრIA?????, should enjoy full rights to their own national identity. At the initial stage, this should envisage ensuring of civil and political freedoms, particularly, the possibility to study in Georgian and creating the national communities, as well as reserving the right to Georgian citizenship. Gradually, the Abkhazian side should provide access to legal proceedings in the Georgian language.

6.Until final settlement of the conflict, we should not talk about either Georgian or Sokhumi‘s absolute sovereignty. We should create the demilitarized zones with transitional bilateral or international administration. We can also take a temporary measure: Gali district is administered by persons appointed from Sokhumi. Simultaneously, a local representative council is functioning

7.Basically, we understand tragedy, as the loss of our territories. However, it is more tragic that our nation, while moving from totalitarian regime to democratic system, failed to find inner force to settle this conflict peacefully. Yes, we were punished, but not because we wanted independence from Russian imperialism, but because of our overweening ambition. If we want to avoid similar situation in the future, as well as to avoid worse tragedies both at personal or national levels, THE ONLY WAY OUT LIES WITHIN GEORGIAN-ABKHAZIAN FEDERALISM.
http://www.civil.ge/eng/article.php?id=8823